Although deconstruction has become a popular catchword, as an intellectual movement it has never entirely caught on within the university. For some in the academy, deconstruction, and Jacques Derrida in particular, are responsible for the demise of accountability in the study of literature. Countering these facile dismissals of Derrida and deconstruction, Herman Rapaport explores the incoherence that has plagued critical theory since the 1960s and the resulting legitimacy crisis in the humanities. Against the backdrop of a rich, informed discussion of Derrida's writings--and how they have been misconstrued by critics and admirers alike-- The Theory Mess investigates the vicissitudes of Anglo-American criticism over the past thirty years and proposes some possibilities for reform.strange placement of Judgment and Execution, which one would expect to conclude a practice manual. ... research he freely admitted it, in one place saying aquot;Indeed I do not understand the ruleaquot; 53 and in another, aquot;this proceeding seems to be without use, ... the clerk at nisi prius to return the postea, Hamilton states, aquot;I suppose the Rule is, That the Clerk of nisi prius return the Postea, or shew cause whyanbsp;...
|Title||:||The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton|
|Author||:||Alexander Hamilton, Julius Goebel, Joseph Henry Smith|
|Publisher||:||Columbia University Press - 1969-01|