John Neary shows that the theological dichotomy of via negativa (which posits the authentic experience of God as absence, darkness, silence) and via affirmativa (which emphasizes presence, images, and the sounds of the earth) is an overlooked key to examining and comparing the works of John Fowles and John Updike. Drawing on his extensive knowledge of both Christian and secular existentialism within the modern theology of Barth and Levinas and the contemporary critical theory of Derrida and J. Hillis Miller, Neary demonstrates the ultimate affinity of these authors who at first appear such opposites. He makes clear that Fowlesas postmodernist, metafictional experiments reflect the stark existentialism of Camus and Sartre while Updikeas social realism recalls Kierkegaardas empirical faith in a generous God within a kind of Christian deconstructionism. Nearyas perception of uncanny similarities between the two authorsawhose respective careers are marked by a series of novels that structurally and thematically parallel each otheraand the authorsa shared long-term interest in existentialism and theology support both his critical comparison and his argument that neither author is qphilosophically more sophisticated nor aesthetically more daring.q... in Literature, Volume 38.4 (Summer 1986): 228-44. Reprint permission granted by Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature, Marquette University, Milwaukee , Wisconsin. I wish to thank Ken Zahorski, St. Norbert Collegea#39;s Director i.
|Title||:||Something and Nothingness|
|Publisher||:||SIU Press - 1992|