The first book to explore rhetorical refusalsainstances in which speakers and writers deliberately flout the conventions of rhetoric and defy their audiencesa expectationsa Rhetorical Refusals: Defying Audiencesa Expectations challenges the reader to view these acts of academic rebellion as worthy of deeper analysis than they are commonly accorded, as rhetorical refusals can simultaneously reveal unspoken assumptions behind the very conventions they challenge, while also presenting new rhetorical strategies. Through a series of case studies, John Schilb demonstrates the deeper meanings contained within rhetorical refusals: when dance critic Arlene Croce refused to see a production that she wrote about; when historian Deborah Lipstadt declined to debate Holocaust deniers; when President Bill Clinton denied a grand jury answers to their questions; and when Frederick Douglass refused to praise Abraham Lincoln unequivocally. Each of these unexpected strategies revealed issues of much greater importance than the subjects at hand. By carefully laying out an underlying framework with which to evaluate these acts, Schilb shows that they can variously point to the undue privilege of authority; the ownership of truth; the illusory divide between public and private lives; and the subjectivity of honor. According to Schilb, rhetorical refusals have the potential to help political discourse become more inventive. To demonstrate this potential, Schilb looks at some notable cases in which invitations have led to unexpected results: comedian Stephen Colbertas brazen performance at the White House Press Association dinner; poet Sharon Oldsas refusal to attend the White House Book Fair, and activist Cindy Sheehanas display of an anti-war message at the 2006 State of the Union Address. Rhetorical Refusals explores rhetorical theories in accessible language without sacrificing complexity and nuance, revealing the unspoken implications of unexpected deviations from rhetorical norms for classic political concepts like free debate and national memory. With case studies taken from art, politics, literature, and history, this book will appeal to scholars and students of English, communication studies, and history.Moreover, she couches her evaluation in the subjunctive mode. Announcing aquot; This is how I would reply to Ellena#39;s essay if I were to do it in the professionally sanctioned wayaquot; (124), Tompkins attempts some distance from academic discourse.
|Publisher||:||SIU Press - 2007-11-20|