In its report, the Committee recommends that qthe Government should as a first step bring forward a draft detailed parliamentary resolution, for consultation with us among others, and for debate and decision by the end of 2011q. The Committee points out that qmuch work in this direction has already been completed, and the process for decision should be relatively swiftq. The Committee welcomes the Foreign Secretary's commitment to enshrine Parliament's role in law, but says this is likely to be a longer-term project. Concerns around the feasibility of a statutory solution would need to be explored and resolved. The Committee also recommends that Parliament's current role in conflict decisions should be clearly described in the Cabinet Manual. The Manual, when published, is intended to be a single source of information for Ministers, civil servants and others on how government works. The issue of Parliament's role in decisions to commit British forces to armed conflict abroad was an area in which considerable work was carried out before the 2010 general election, particularly in the context of the war in Iraq, but without any concrete result. In its recent report on the constitutional implications of the Cabinet Manual, the committee commented on the qsurprisingq omission from the draft Manual of any mention of Parliament's role in decisions to commit troops to armed conflict. The issue became topical once again in the context of the ongoing military action in Libya.Would it be true to say that there is never a settled solution to anything? ... However, in matters of high policy, such as war-making, as I point out in some of my written work, the courts very much stay out because they dona#39;t feel functionally anbsp;...
|Title||:||Parliament's Role in Conflict Decisions|
|Author||:||Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Political and Constitutional Reform Committee|
|Publisher||:||The Stationery Office - 2011-05-17|