This book provides a critical re-examination of the Innovation Union Scoreboard (IUS) as the main tool used by the European Commission and other policy-making bodies to measure national innovation capacity. Given that contemporary societies and economies are to a great extent characterised by the processes of production, dissemination and application (re-combination) of knowledge, the accurate monitoring and measurement of RaD efficiency and innovation performance on national, regional and firm level are of outmost importance. The contextual reconstruction of the model of indicators used by IUS reveals that the accuracy and validity of measurement are not satisfactory, and that substantial modifications of metrics are needed to achieve stronger theoretical significance and policy-relevance. In this work, the Arepistemic turnAl is emphasised and offered as an alternative, namely in the sense of the shift from a mechanicist-positivist orientation toward a more reflective and contextual post-positivist approach. ?However, dealing specifically with collecting and interpreting innovation data, the Oslo Manual is much younger (1992) ... focus also spilling over into sectors where Raamp;D is typically almost non-existent or very low (Freeman and Soete 2007 ;anbsp;...
|Title||:||Measuring National Innovation Performance|
|Publisher||:||Springer Science & Business Media - 2013-10-09|