This book takes the CMME¾/CMMIE¾-SW (Staged) Level 2 process appraisal methodology and performs a mapping against where this information is found in the IEEE Standards. The assumption is made that the standards are implemented as is, with no tailoring. This provides the reader with information regarding the value added by using the IEEE Standards to implement and define software process. The strengths and weaknesses of these standards are a by-product of this comparison. The CMME¾ and CMMIE¾ do not tell the user howac to satisfy their KPA criteria. The CMME¾ and CMMIE¾ are descriptive. They do not describe how to accomplish their goals but describe the criteria that the end results should support. IEEE Standards are prescriptive. These standards describe how to fulfill the requirements associated with effective software project management. For organizations that do not wish to pursue CMME¾/CMMIE¾ Level 2 accreditation this document will show how the application of IEEE Standards, and their use as reference material, can facilitate the development of sound software engineering practices.Derived from this IEEE standard for software project management plans. Section A.3.5, develop maintenance plan. Software management plan format. Software maintenance plan format. AC8 Software work products that IEEE Std are needed anbsp;...
|Title||:||Jumpstart CMM/CMMI Software Process Improvement|
|Author||:||Susan K. Land|
|Publisher||:||Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press - 2005-01-27|