The Dutch, German and French languages display a variety of regularly used connectives all of which introduce causes, arguments or reasons, such as Dutchomdat, want and aangezien, German weil, denn and da, and Frenchparce que, car and puisque. Why should languages have different connectives to express the notion of backward causality? The central argument developed in this book is that different connectives express different degrees of subjectivity. In a series of corpus analyses it is shown that the degree of subjectivity of the main participant involved in the causal relation strongly predicts the occurrence of one or another connective. Hence, language users have at their disposal connectives of varying degrees of subjectivity. In an analysis of judiciary sentences, it is revealed that speakers are actually sensitive of this semantic distinction, and sometimes even exploit it for their communicative purposes: in order to conceal their subjective involvement, judges prefer objective over subjective connectives.This volume makes a contribution to the study of language in use, by applying empirical methods to authentic language data. It will be of interest to anyone concerned with discourse coherence, perspective and subjectivity, corpus linguistics and cross-linguistic analyses.However, as I explained in the Dutch analysis, a#39;actual speaker cpV can be included here; if the narrator is a character in the story, explicit reference to this ... (l0) Elle na#39;avait aucun sens de rhumour car elle fit mine de lever la main sur moi.
|Title||:||How to Express Yourself with a Causal Connective|
|Publisher||:||Rodopi - 2003-01-01|