This report assesses whether the Smithsonian Institution should continue to receive direct federal appropriations for its scientific research programs or if this funding should be transferred to a peer-reviewed program open to all researchers in another agency. The report concludes that the National Museum of Natural History, the National Zoological Park, and the Smithsonian Center for Materials Research and Education in Suitland should remain exempt from having to compete for federal research dollars because they make unique contributions to the scientific and museum communities. Three other Smithsonian research programs should continue to receive federal funding since they are performing science of the highest quality and already compete for much of their government research money.He served as president of AAU from 1993 to 1998 and as provost of the University of Southern California from 1981 to 1993. ... as professor of chemical engineering and chemical physics, vice provost, and dean of graduate studies at California Institute of Technology. ... Before assuming her academic positions, she worked with local and state government agencies in wetlands mapping inventory andanbsp;...
|Title||:||Funding Smithsonian Scientific Research|
|Author||:||Committee on Smithsonian Scientific Research, National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Physics and Astronomy, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Life Sciences|
|Publisher||:||National Academies Press - 2003-01-28|